VerdictAI

Reviewer consensus · 2026

Best All-in-One Printers of 2026What 43 reviewers actually think, trust-weighted

All-in-one printers are notoriously hard to shop for because the marketing rarely matches real-world reliability, ink economics, or scan quality. To cut through that, we read across independent testing labs, mainstream tech press, verified-purchase retailer reviews, and specialist printer communities to surface where reviewers actually agree, and where they don't. The picks below are weighted toward sources with documented testing; thinly-reviewed models in the candidate pool were left off rather than padded in.

Sources behind this verdict

43 reviewers, weighted by source trust

43reviewers read

Weighted by source trust

We don’t review products. We read what other reviewers wrote, score each source for trustworthiness, and synthesize the consensus.

How sources are scored →

Trust hierarchy

Trusted3
Verified0
Supporting21
Flagged0

Source mix

43signals
  • 2Press
  • 1Retailer
  • 24Community
  • 16Video

Trusted · 3 sources

Independent · documented methodology
r/printersConsumer Reportsr/photography

Supporting · 21 named sources

PressRetailerCommunityVideo
PCMagTarget customersr/readbeforebuyingr/AmazonViner/sysadminr/homeschoolr/buildapcsalesr/magicproxiesr/australiar/mildlyinfuriatingYouTube · review videoYouTube · one Printer Review ...YouTube · One Printer for ...YouTube · One Printer Full ...YouTube · Best MegaTank Printer for Home ...YouTube · One Printer ReviewYouTube · One ...YouTube · Epson ET2800 Ecotank Printer ReviewYouTube · Depth ReviewYouTube · My honest review...YouTube · Function Home Printer

At a glance

Compare

Pick any two for a head-to-head

Scores, pros, cons, and our verdict — side by side.

vs

Highest-rated by the consensus

#1 of 4
Top pick · #1HP OfficeJet Pro 9135 Wireless All-in-One Color Inkjet Printer, Print, Scan, Copy, Fax, ADF, Duplex…
Best overall

HP OfficeJet Pro 9135 Wireless All-in-One Color Inkjet Printer, Print, Scan, Copy, Fax, ADF, Duplex…

★★★★★4.4(24)83Great

Across the reviewers we read, the HP OfficeJet Pro 9135 lands as the most well-rounded office-oriented all-in-one in this pool. RTINGS, a high-trust testing source, found the related 9135e "decent for home use," producing sharp documents and printing quickly at up to roughly 23 black and 15 color pages per minute.

Price

$299.99

Read review →Check Price

The rest of the rankings

#2,4

Frequently asked

4 questions
Are ink-tank (supertank) printers cheaper than cartridge printers?
For anyone printing regularly, the consensus across the reviewers we read is yes. High-trust testing of the Canon MAXIFY GX2020 and Epson EcoTank ET-2800 repeatedly highlights extraordinarily low per-page costs because you refill bottles instead of buying cartridges. The trade-off is a higher upfront price, so light or occasional printers may not recoup the difference.
Should I avoid HP printers that require Instant Ink or genuine HP supplies?
It's a real consideration. Specialist community threads repeatedly warn that HP models tied to ink-replenishment services (often marked with an 'e') can refuse third-party or remanufactured cartridges. If you want freedom to use cheaper aftermarket ink, factor that lock-in into your decision before buying an OfficeJet Pro.
Which all-in-one is best if I scan a lot of documents?
Scan quality is where reviewers diverge most. High-trust testing praises the HP OfficeJet Pro 9135 for sharp document scans and dual paper trays, while specialist-subreddit posts flag scanning as a weak point on some Canon MAXIFY units and mediocre scan quality on certain Epson EcoTanks. If scanning volume matters, prioritize a model with a tested ADF.
Is a cheap inkjet all-in-one worth it for occasional home use?
For light, occasional printing, budget models like the Canon PIXMA TS4320 cover the basics at a low entry price. But community reviewers consistently cite slow print speeds and small paper trays, and ink cost per page is high relative to supertank models, so heavy users tend to regret the savings.